Prevalence of Presbyopia in Adults Attended at a Regional Ophthalmology Referral Center in the Colombian Caribbean: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study
Main Article Content
Keywords
Presbyopia, Visual Acuity, Refractive Errors, Ophthalmology Services, Colombia
Abstract
Objective: To determine the prevalence of presbyopia in an adult population attended at a regional ophthalmology referral center in Cartagena, Colombian Caribbean. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted, including adults evaluated between 2018 and 2023. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were analyzed, along with ophthalmologic examination findings. Data were obtained from institutional medical records. Results: A total of 8,934 patients were included, 80.5% of whom were aged 41 to 65 years, and 59.3% were female. The most frequent spherical refractive error was hyperopia (48.9%), followed by emmetropia (30.7%). Regarding near visual acuity, 93.7% of subjects had values in the +0.50 to +0.75 diopter range. The most common lens addition ranged from +2.25 to +3.00 diopters (58.2%), suggesting a high demand for near vision correction. Conclusions: Presbyopia is a prevalent visual condition among adults in the Colombian Caribbean, frequently associated with hyperopia. These findings support the need for public health strategies aimed at early detection, timely correction, and promotion of eye health in the region.
References
2. Singh P, Tripathy K. Presbyopia [Internet]. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan– [updated 2023 Aug 25; cited 2024 Aug 28]. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560568/
3. McDonald M, Barnett M, Gaddie I. Classification of presbyopia by severity. Ophthalmol Ther. 2022;11:1-11. doi:10.1007/s40123-021-00410-w
4. Katz JA, Karpecki PM, Dorca A, Chiva-Razavi S, Floyd H, Barnes E, et al. Presbyopia – a review of current treatment options and emerging therapies. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:2167-78. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S259011
5. GBD 2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators; Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study. Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9(2):e144-e160. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30489-7
6. Fricke TR, Tahhan N, Resnikoff S, Papas E, Burnett A, Suit MH, et al. Global prevalence of presbyopia and vision impairment from uncorrected presbyopia: systematic review, meta-analysis, and modelling. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(10):1492-9. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.04.013
7. Ayaki M, Negishi K. Short tear breakup time could exacerbate the progression of presbyopia in women. Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022:8159669. doi:10.1155/2022/8159669
8. Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, Jong M, Naidoo KS, Sankaridurg P, et al. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(5):1036-42. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006
9. Markoulli M, Fricke TR, Arvind A, Frick KD, Hart KM, Joshi MR, et al. BCLA CLEAR presbyopia: epidemiology and impact. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2024;47(4):102157. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2024.102157
10. World Health Organization. Blindness and vision impairment [Internet]. [cited 2024 Aug 28]. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/blindness-and-visual-impairment
11. Lozada-Martínez ID, Lozada-Martínez LM, Fiorillo-Moreno O. Leiden manifesto and evidence-based research: are the appropriate standards being used for the correct evaluation of pluralism, gaps and relevance in medical research? J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2024;54(1):4-6. doi:10.1177/14782715241227991
12. Silva-Rued ML, Ramírez-Romero A, Guerra-Maestre LR, Forero-Hollmann ÁM, Lozada-Martínez ID. The need to develop specialized surgical centers: the evidence that surgical diseases cannot wait. Int J Surg. 2021;92:106036. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106036
13. Lozada-Martínez ID, Bolaño-Romero MP, Picón-Jaimes YA, Moscote-Salazar LR, Narvaez-Rojas AR. Quality or quantity? Questions on the growth of global scientific production. Int J Surg. 2022;105:106862. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106862
14. Dabian DA, Peña-Moyano F. Prevalencia y causas de ceguera y discapacidad visual en Colombia. Cienc Tecnol Salud Vis Ocul. 2020;18(2):21-30. doi:10.19052/sv.vol18.iss2.3
15. Fotedar R, Wang JJ, Burlutsky G, Morgan IG, Rose K, Wong TY, et al. Distribution of axial length and ocular biometry measured using partial coherence laser interferometry (IOL Master) in an older white population. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(3):417-23. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.07.028
16. Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística. Estadísticas de población, 2020 [Internet]. [citado 2024 Ago 28]. Disponible en: https://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/demografia-y-poblacion/poblacion/proyecciones-de-poblacion
17. Sociedad Colombiana de Oftalmología. Estadísticas de problemas de visión en Colombia, 2019 [Internet]. [citado 2024 Ago 28]. Disponible en: https://www.socoftal.com.co/
18. Domínguez-Alvarado G, Villar-Rincón K, Castillo-Miranda M, Quintero-Díaz A, Ramírez-Rangel A, Lozada-Martínez ID, et al. A step-by-step guide to creating an academic surgery interest group: review article. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021;69:102688. doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102688
19. Miranda-Pacheco JA, De Santis-Tamara SA, Parra-Pinzón SL, González-Monterroza JJ, Lozada-Martínez ID. Medical interest groups and work policies as emerging determinants of a successful career: a student perspective – correspondence. Int J Surg. 2021;92:106020. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106020
20. Lozada-Martínez I, Bolaño-Romero M, Moscote-Salazar L, Torres-Llinas D. Letter to the Editor: “Medical education in times of COVID-19: what’s new in neurosurgery?”. World Neurosurg. 2020;143:603. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2020.07.215
